Phone hacking, are mobile phone operators also to blame?

If you’re a UK national, or probably not… you’ll today is the last edition of ‘news of the world’, a Sunday news paper which has become a British institution, running some of the biggest UK stories & campaigns over the 168 (1843 – 2011) years of its existence, to one of the largest news paper audiences, 7.5 million people. Many of us know that the paper is closing because of the recent phone hacking scandal, evidence has come to light that NOTW whilst all its campaigning for good causes has betrayed the nation, hacking phones of victims and war heroes in an attempt to get a good scoop.
Now many people hold the individuals who did this to account and I completely agree, but there is one set of people who seem to be getting off lightly here. A group of companies which are a major contributor to a massive security flaw. To explain this requies a small insight into how you hack someones voicemails, quite simply, you dial the victims (the person you want to hack) mobile number, wait for voicemail to kick in then press either * or # depending to enter remote voicemail, you then have to enter a password. By default this is either 0000 or 1234 or some other easy combination, dependant on which mobile carrier and its the same for every person on that network. Now seeing as voicemails usually answer ‘You’re through to the orange answer phone’ we immediately know the key combination and password to try & if the user doesn’t change their password, we are in. We have control to listen and delete messages.
So the biggest group of companies to get off lightly is the mobile phone operators, they are in effect responsible for providing inadequate support to change a voicemail password or setting a default one in the first place. When I get a new bank card, I also receive a 4 digit pin, usually sent separately to the card via post containing a random 4 digit sequence. Now had they just used a default pin, lets say 0000 or 1234 (look familiar) we immediately have access to that bank card, to withdraw cash from a machine or use chip and pin. It would be a complete nightmare. Now how many people would change their bank card pin if this was the default, probably the majority of people wont unless specifically told.
Now I am not trying to say we are at fault, lets face it unless your a security expert you don’t think about things like that, so the banks made it simple and gave us a random 4 digit number, making it a hell of a lot harder for someone to intercept a card and use a ‘default’ pin. When I get sent my new random pin I still don’t change it, there is no need. Someone could eventually guess it, but this would take considerable amount of time and effort, there are 10,000 different sequences made from 4 digits. We all agree that’s hard and not worth the time but then if we were a criminal after money we might, but a fail safe kicks in after 3 wrong attempts (either the card is swallowed by the machine or its somehow blocked out, if you’re that interested I am sure there is a wiki article).
Now consider applying this model to a mobile phone, a random 4 digit pin is assigned. Its now going to take us a maximum of 10,000 attempts to guess that password. If you are that desperate you may try, but for the sake of a voicemail and you’re a journalist you won’t waste your time and effort, there are far easier scoops to get. Still not satisfied, let’s say you are a determined individual, if we add the 3 attempts fail safe with either a remote access block for 15 minutes or until you dial the support number from your device (121 if you’re Vodafone) to unblock it. We have now made it more secure just by randomising a number and adding a fail safe.
This is achieved in a number of ways, at a cost to the mobile operator, but when security of customer data is concerned we expect them to pay for the cost, or we move to someone who will (in this case another carrier). When I first take out my phone contract I could be forced to select a pin whether its in store, online or by phone only I know my pin. Another option, which the banks use, is to randomly set a number and make sure you take a note of it. With any password if we forget it, we call the support line and go through a few security questions and they reset it there and then.
So who is to blame? Firstly the individuals who do it, they should be jailed for illegal activity and secondly the mobile operators for having a massive security flaw and not attempting to inform us to change our pin. But lets not forget to some extent us, for naively assuming a default password was by any means secure in the first place and we should have identified this years ago. Now I don’t expect a single mobile phone company to even bother taking steps to secure voicemails, there is no bad press about them and its not worth the cost of a system upgrade until someone points this out. Oh wait I just did! (But I’m not exactly Sky News).